Cops and Robyers....

Security for Costs vs. Standard Terms & Conditions

trumpp — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:44:19 +0000

Our standard terms & conditions include a clause which basically says that if we institute legal proceedings the other party can’t ask for security for costs. When challenged on this in court the judge found in favour of the other party on the basis that it is “unlawful to include such a clause in the contract” WHAT DO YOU THINK – DOES IT MAKE SENSE???

The right of a person under investigation to be consulted before a decision is taken on prosecution.

trumpp — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:19:29 +0000

Commentary on the recent Zuma judgement …. No one can fault the judgment on the core, procedural issue relating to the right of a person under investigation to be consulted before a decision is taken on prosecution. Is this true???

Legal Fees verus Performance

trumpp — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:32:33 +0000

I went to see my attorney in Feb this year about a very urgent matter regarding my bond. I saw the attorney after which I received numerous calls asking for a deposit. I paid R3000 deposit. Since then I make weekly calls to find out what the progress is. Despite calls, faxes and emails the only response I get is that he is busy with the matter and waiting for feedback from an advocate. Some 6 months later still nothing. If I go to the attorney and ask him to close the file in the matter I can KISS the deposit goodbye. Unusual no everyday.

For me details go to http://legal.coolforums.org

Trust Account – Who’s money is it anyway???

trumpp — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:22:17 +0000

We placed money in
trust with a lawyer for a specific person. We reached an agreement with
this person and agreed to pay the trust monies over to him. Our lawyer
refused to transfer the money until we paid his legal fees. We agreed
to pay on a taxed bill of account. The lawyer refused to provide a
taxed bill. We complained to the Law Society. They were not prepared to
get involved nor would they even comment on whether or not the attorney
was entitled to withhold monies held in trust. Because of time
constraints we had no choice but to pay the legal fees?? For a detailed
discussion go to http://legal.coolforums.org

The High Court System ????

trumpp — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:30:20 +0000

I want to canvass against the High Court System which enforces a defendant in a divorce to pay massive fees on Counsel. Senior Counsel demand to have Junior Counsel, and both must be instructed by a lawyer. All in all @ R50,000 a day. I have been forced to spend six weeks in court against my ex husband’s meritless applications intended only to wear me down financially and emotionally. I am all but ruined financially and have almost lost the will to live. Why on God’s good earth should a mother and small child endure this treatment by the Courts in South Africa against an onslaught by a wealthy family in London paying what for them is a fraction of what they would have to pay in London i.e. 300 pounds an hour just for the lawyer alone, when I have no income and am paying in Rands ? My child and I have been suffering the torments of hell for the past four years, since he was two years old, he is now six, trying to prevent the haemorrhage of my entire life savings. R2million has gone down the drain so far. We have a useless BEE Judge who no legal body takes responsibility for and there is no end in sight to our misery. I have had no choice but to sell my home of ten years, my car, my caravan. Bit by bit we are becoming destitute. I now face returning to court with no representation, to face a ruthless and unethical Senior Counsel and Senior Lawyer who have done everything in their power for four long years to drive me to suicide while I try my utmost to look after my child alone and with no family in South Africa. I have done nothing wrong. It was my husband who left for another woman. Yet he is burying me alive and wants to offload our son and myself after ten years of marriage. His lies about my ‘abusive conduct’ throughout our marriage were only designed to offload his guilt. Is there no justice in South Africa? I am British, but am being prevented from returning home as I cannot leave the jurisdiction of the Cape High Court with my child without my ex husband’s permission which he refuses to give. It’s insane. My ex husband lives in London full time with his new wife and baby, while we remain tied to a whipping post here in SA.

I am a crook.

trumpp — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:01:05 +0000

We assume that all lawyers are equal. They are not. How do you know whether your one passed summa cum laude at the top of the class on his first try? Or whether he only scraped 50.1% after taking six years to finish that last term? I think we can agree that these two persons might not be in the same league, legally speaking. One is the star scrum half, while the other punches the tickets at the entrance to the field. When you’re testing ideas, they are so frail that the smallest hint of a “No” is enough to kill them. If we do not review where that “No” comes from, then our dreams will keep on being stillborn. Only go to your lawyer if you have thought through the questions to want to ask, and you have clarified the idea in your own mind. I may have assumed that all lawyers are the same. I am sorry if it seems that way. The fellow at the turnstile will be the first to point out how wrong I am.

Have an excellent week. Peter Carruthers

Take control back from your lawyer

trumpp — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:26:34 +0000

So many small business owners put there livelihoods and future in the hands of lawyers without questioning the ability or skills of that person. Generally success is this area is directly proportional to how much money you have. The only way to overcome this is through tried and tested strategies – dont expect your lawyer to help you with this. Knowledge is power so lets start talking…..

Need a lawyer in Randburg

trumpp — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:58:55 +0000

Do you know of any good lawyers in the Randburg area. Please I am looking
for someone reasonably priced. For more details see http://legal.coolforums.org

What do the Zuma case and the Inge Lotz case have in common

trumpp — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:48:29 +0000

(1) The case was driven by an unseen hand. (2) This unseen hand predetermined what the outcome of the case would be (3) The prosecution team followed instructions blindly (4) The accused was not allowed to put his side of the case (5) the might of the state was applied to ensure the intended outcome was achieved (6) the case was tried in public (7) the accused was fortunate to have large financial resources to stage a fight back (8) sufficiently motivated and financed the defense was able to use the law to defeat the action (9) the justice system worked (10) ULTIMATELY IT WASN’T THE TRUTH THAT TRIUMPHED BUT MONEYfor more see http://legal.coolforums.org